Fancy me saying the following, but if you are going to rant against something, you might actually take the time to know something about that which you are going to rant against. So we come to unschooling. This is only partially prompted by that dumb fuck Dr. Phil who seems to have a PhD in being a loudmouth jackass more than anything else.
Most people who have opted for any variety of homeschooling have plenty of experience and knowledge about public and/or private schooling which may or may not have prompted their decision to alternately provide for their children's education. We know of which we speak.
Of course the whole concept of education needs to be discussed, another point I'm not quite going to bother going into here. I could go into it because I have fairly strong opinions about it. What does education really mean in a time when most of what we think we know can easily be expected to be outdated and proven unnecessary in very little time?
It seems that unschooling is the newest horse that is going to get beaten past the point of no noticeable pulse, and those horse beaters are not really in a position to have a say. And if it ended there many of us on the pro side wouldn't care. The path to shitty laws, like the road to hell, is paved with the very best of intentions (see prohibition for more info) which makes the anti crowd think highly of themselves and their opinions, but they seem to forget the whole "to hell" part.
Please understand that we welcome everyone to their opinions. That's the beauty of a free society, that people can think any outlandish thing they want (see young earth creationist for more info.) That same freedom gives me the right to tell people that they are idiots.
Unschooling is lots of things to lots of people. Like anything in life, there are some people who claim authority to decide what is and isn't unschooling. For some it means fairly broad avenues of freedom for their children to be and act in any way they want. For some it means that they do schoolwork sitting in the floor instead of at the table. For some it might mean a fairly active life full of options for them and their kids to learn as much as they can and want to learn. That last one most accurately describes most homeschoolers and unschoolers.
Many people would say that we unschoolers are lazy parents who allow our kids to watch tv all day with no input. I'd say the lazy parents are those that let the school educate their kids and then blame those schools for their kids problems. See how that works, how I generalize about parents of public school kids? It isn't accurate for all public school parents, and I know that, but I like to make blanket statements about things even though I do know different. It's different from some bloggers who make blanket statements without the knowledge.
I know families involved in all the varieties of childhood education. I know families whose children all attend public schools and would never even consider homeschooling. I know families who homeschool some kids while other kids attend school. I know families who school their children very formally using one single curriculum. I know families who school fairly formally using a variety of educational options including curriculum for certain areas as well as a piecemeal approach for other areas. I know families who don't use any sort of recognizable schooling, families who completely unschool letting their children learn as children do when allowed, and that's the option that we've chose for our kids. I've seen all of these approaches work. It's not my place to tell any of these families that their chosen option is wrong or right.
I wasn't going to write this post, though because of the Dr. Phil fallout, it's been stuck in my brain wanting to get out. I am daily amazed at the misconceptions that people dream up and call fact. If I called fact everything that came into my head, this blog would be a far more fucked up place than I've already made it. You people don't realize how lucky you are that I practice some self control. At least I try to pretend I've done some research before I freak out on paper (okay, not really paper, but anything else ruins the flow.)
And finally, totally off topic, but Blogger needs to figure out that homeschooling and unschooling are indeed both words and that I have not misspelled them several times. I'm tired of the little red underlines from Firefox as well. I know how to spell damn it!
4 comments:
You can right click the red underlining and add your words to the dictionary, that's the last time they'll be underlined in red.
What qualifies you as a teacher?
If you're actually outraged by someone as obtuse as Dr. Phil I don't think you're using your time very well.
Quick little note to you.
I've read your site and I didn't intend my comment to incite ire. I meant it to be this:
1) A tip about Firefox and Google so you can get rid of the red line.
2) A question. It was a real question with no insult expressed or implied. I was just too lazy to read 20,000 words to find out why you felt qualified.
3) From your writing I gather that you are likely brighter and more introspective than Dr. Phil and blogging about him and his inane opinions is likely not a good use of your time.
I really had enjoyed your other posts.
I think many home school parents would be better off sending their kids to private or public schools. Some are barely literate themselves.
I have an undergrad degree in the sciences and a Master's in Education. Because I spent the time getting that second degree I realized how woefully unprepared I was to teach. I also know my own limitations and I'd rather do menial labor than teach literature. I love to read and I'm a capable writer but that does not qualify me to teach it.
If to the point and short comments are not for you then I'll leave you mini novellas with kind questions at the end.
Again, no offense was meant but you did answer my question, a bit as to what qualifies you as a teacher.
May I suggest picking up a copy of "The Unschooled Mind" by Howard Gardner. It's readily available at Amazon and it's a must read for any educator. Gardner is the Harvard professor who came up with the theory of multiple intelligences.
By educator I also (always) mean parent.
Regarding my "trolling" other sites. I care about kids and academia so when I came across a "school schedule" that included such a small amount of time devoted to "school" I almost fell out of my chair. I would be in support of "schools" like that being overseen by the local school board. I find it terrifying.
210 minutes is not a school day, it's just a good start.
I agree with this post, especially the part about unschooling parents not being lazy. I'd say any parent who is so interested in their child's education as to study unschooling and homeschool the child is the opposite of lazy.
Public schools aren't about education or learning. Public schools are about making obedient working-class drones. Anyway, I say each parent (or student, in the case of older students) can choose what they think is best for them.
Thanks,
Scott Hughes
Education Forums
I'm researching unschooling and I'm fascinated! I think it will be a perfect fit for our family. I'm happy to have found your blog - someone who is interested in unschooling (for lack of a better term) and HIV/AIDS. I blog about both of these topics at www.PositivelyOrphaned.com and www.OurLifeOnPlanetEarth.wordpress. Looking forward to following along...
Post a Comment